Suggestions for OWL 3
نویسنده
چکیده
With OWL 2 about to be completed, it is the right time to start discussions on possible future modifications of OWL. We present here a number of suggestions in order to discuss them with the OWL user community. They encompass expressive extensions on polynomial OWL 2 profiles, a suggestion for an OWL Rules language, and expressive extensions for OWL DL.
منابع مشابه
Constructing RuleML-Based Domain Theories on Top of OWL Ontologies
Situation Awareness involves the comprehension of the state of a collection of objects in an evolving environment. This not only includes an understanding of the objects’ characteristics but also an awareness of the significant relations that hold among the objects at any point in time. Systems for establishing situation awareness require a knowledge representation for these objects and relatio...
متن کاملBuilding Applications and Tools for OWL - Experiences and Suggestions
The success of the Semantic Web will largely depend on whether W3C’s Web Ontology Language can reach broad acceptance and a critical mass of industry-strength applications. We have been exploiting the use of OWL with a particular focus on tool support for ontology authoring and on providing access to the Semantic Web for mobile applications. In the latter case our vision is to overlay the Seman...
متن کاملWhat One Can Learn from Extracting OWL Ontologies from a NetLogo Model That Was Not Designed for Such an Exercise
J. Gary Polhill's forum paper in this issue was an invitation to try the OWL extension on a model that was written more than a year ago. Download and installation was a matter of a few minutes, extending the old model with a few lines as shown in the paper was not a problem either, visualising the OWL output with different versions of Protégé was a little more difficult, but in the end showed i...
متن کاملModeling in OWL 2 without Restrictions
The Semantic Web ontology language OWL 2 DL comes with a variety of language features that enable sophisticated and practically useful modeling. However, the use of these features has been severely restricted in order to retain decidability of the language. For example, OWL 2 DL does not allow a property to be both transitive and asymmetric, which would be desirable, e.g., for representing an a...
متن کاملOWL: PAX of Mind or the AX that Caused the Split?
This paper argues that several factors conspired to produce a less than optimal OWL version of BioPAX, describes what those factors were, and presents suggestions about a better way to proceed. The BioPAX workgroup agreed to implement BioPAX in OWL-DL and XML-Schema. OWL has a steep learning, and the difficulties at the time of its adoption by the BioPAX community were compounded by the lack of...
متن کامل